home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- @comment Tell Emacs to use -*-texinfo-*- mode
- @comment $Id: ruggie.tex,v 2.2 91/09/01 23:04:40 royce Exp $
-
- @node Anti-Ruggie Measures, Shells vs. the Desktop, Doors, Top
- @chapter Anti-Ruggie Measures
- @cindex Anti-ruggie measures
-
- @cindex Ruggie
- @dfn{Ruggie} is short for ``rug-rat''; it's a somewhat mutated term
- which now refers to any brat, twit, twerp, loser, wanker, nud, idiot, len,
- moron, or generally, any walking waste of protoplasm. These types of
- people (often, though by no means exclusively, kids who've
- just been given their first modem for Christmas) may suddenly spring up
- and begin to plague your @sc{bbs}. They may do any one of a number of things,
- from logging in and asking stupid questions, to putting drivel in the
- discussion rooms, to strewing megabytes of profanity all over your board.
- If they do the former, then you may simply want to take them aside, so to
- speak, and answer their questions. If they do something like the latter,
- then read on.
-
- @node Philosophy, Secret Weapons, Anti-Ruggie Measures, Anti-Ruggie Measures
- @section Philosophy
-
- ``But first, a brief philosophical interlude.'' The developers
- of Fnordadel have been running conversation-only @sc{bbs}es for a
- number of years (the Round Table, Royce's board, went up in
- August of 1984, and Secret Service, Adrian's board, has been around
- since March of 1986). In all that time, a philosophy of ``open''
- Sysoping has prevailed. That is, we've always disliked the
- validation style of @sc{bbs}es---the kind where you have to leave
- ten pages of personal information before the Sysop will grant
- you access to his system. We prefer to run systems where
- anyone can create a new account at any time, without Sysoply
- intervention, and then dive into most of what goes on with the system.
-
- The problem with this, of course, is that undesirables
- tend to slip in. Any ruggie can call in and leave his drivel
- or profanity at any time, and there ain't much that the Sysop
- can do about it. About the most he can do, on a standard
- Citadel, is delete the offending messages as soon as he sees
- them, hopefully before they got sent anywhere if the rooms affected
- are networked, and pray the ruggie doesn't call back. Or he can turn
- his system into a ``closed'', validation-style system, which may
- not be an attractive option. It certainly isn't to us.
-
- Here in Edmonton, we've had a pretty determined gang
- of ruggies plaguing the boards for a couple of years, and it
- was primarily these twits who prompted the development of
- Fnordadel's anti-ruggie features which aren't found on other
- Citadels.
-
- @emph{Please note:} no security measures
- ever devised can stop a determined incursion, so we advise you
- to be pretty low-key about what security measures you may have in
- place, to avoid tempting people to break them.
-
- @node Secret Weapons, Ruggie Hints and Notes, Philosophy, Anti-Ruggie Measures
- @section The Secret Weapons
-
- Here, then, are the tools at your disposal. Use any
- combination that works for you without causing your regular users
- undue discomfort.
-
- @node Paranoid mode, Messages per room per call, Secret Weapons, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Paranoid mode
- @cindex Paranoid mode
- @cindex Getname mode
-
- Standard Fnordadel requires that users login
- using their password only; if people are intelligent in
- choosing their passwords, this works fine and is quicker
- than having to type in one's user name as well. Unfortunately,
- many people are not the least bit intelligent when it
- comes to password choosing (or anything else, for that
- matter), so it leaves a resourceful ruggie with some
- golden opportunities to hack someone's account and cause
- chaos.
-
- If you define the variable @code{#getname} to have the value
- @vindex getname
- @samp{1} in your @file{ctdlcnfg.sys} (referred to in the literature as
- ``paranoid mode'', for hysterical@dots{} err@dots{} historical reasons),
- Fnordadel will ask for both a name and a
- password when logging users in. This means that a ruggie
- has to guess not only a user's password, but to which user
- the password belongs. This is pretty tough.
-
- @node Messages per room per call, Mail messages per call, Paranoid mode, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Messages per room per call
- @cindex Limits, messages per room per call
-
- A favourite ruggie trick is to use an automated
- macro to enter one message (frequently something short but
- obscene) into one or more rooms, over and over and over
- again; the goal being to scroll all the real messages out
- of your message base.
-
- To combat this, Fnordadel allows you to define
- the maximum number of messages which any given user can
- enter in any given room during any one login session.
- (The @code{Mail>} room is an exception; see the next section.)
- Simply define the @file{ctdlcnfg.sys} variable @code{#msgenter} to be
- @vindex msgenter
- your desired maximum. For most systems, a number like @samp{4}
- or @samp{5} is pretty good; it allows the legitimate users
- plenty of leeway for verbosity, while helping to contain
- the damage done by a vandal. Deleting 4 or 5 messages
- from a few rooms is much better than deleting hundreds,
- or having to nuke your message base because it's full of
- ``Sysop Sucks Eggs'' messages.
-
- Setting this parameter to @samp{0} means there is no
- limit on the number of messages enterable by anybody.
- Even if the value is non-zero, all Aides, Co-Sysops and the Sysop are
- exempt from the limit. Hopefully you won't all run wild.
-
- @node Mail messages per call, Calls per day, Messages per room per call, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Mail messages per call
- @cindex Limits, mail messages per call
-
- The parameter @code{#mailenter} in @file{ctdlcnfg.sys}
- @vindex mailenter
- works exactly like its counterpart @code{msgenter} described above.
- It controls only the @code{Mail>} room, however, and thus allows you
- to independently alter users' use of private mail. Not only
- can this be used to stop vandals from flooding your decent
- users with junk mail, it can be used to control non-ruggies
- who may be a bit too enthusiastically posting private messages.
-
- Again, setting this parameter to @samp{0} means there is no
- limit on the number of messages enterable by anybody. Aides, Co-Sysops
- and the Sysop are exempt from the limit in any case.
-
- Another parameter to consider in this area is @code{allmail}.
- If set to @samp{1}, the parameter allows all users full access to
- entering messages in the @code{Mail>} room. If set to @samp{0}, however,
- users are not able to enter mail to anybody except @samp{Sysop},
- unless you manually give them mail privileges (@pxref{User Status Commands}).
- Naturally, Aides, Co-Sysops and the Sysop always
- have full @code{Mail>} access. See @file{flipbits.man} if
- @pindex flipbits
- you need a way to set
- the mail access flag for all users in one swell foop.
-
- @node Calls per day, Connect time per day, Mail messages per call, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Maximum number of calls per day
- @cindex Limits, calls per day
-
- This parameter is called @code{#maxcalls} in @file{ctdlcnfg.sys},
- @vindex maxcalls
- and is used to limit the total number of calls any user (except
- Aides, Co-Sysops and the Sysop, of course) may make in a given day. Again,
- setting the parameter to @samp{0} means there is no limit.
-
- @node Connect time per day, Close calls per day, Calls per day, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Maximum connect time per day
- @cindex Limits, connect time
-
- This parameter is called @code{#maxtime} in @file{ctdlcnfg.sys},
- @vindex maxtime
- and is used to limit the total connect time any user (except
- Aides, Co-Sysops and the Sysop, of course) may use up in a given day. The
- value is in minutes. Again, setting the it to @samp{0} means there
- is no limit.
-
- This measure is like the others, in that it is non-intrusive---users
- will not be booted off the system the second they
- exceed their daily allotment of connect time. Instead, they
- will be allowed to finish their current login session. But
- if they call back the same day, they will not be permitted entry.
- This seems to us like a good mix of control for the Sysop vs.
- consideration for the users.
-
- A related parameter that you might want to look at is
- @code{mincalltime}. This value is in minutes, and specifies the
- minimum connect time you wish to ``charge'' a user on any call,
- no matter how short it is. (For example, if you set this variable to
- @samp{5}, all calls of five minutes or less will be charged as five minutes.)
- The lowest acceptable value is @samp{1},
- but you can set it higher if you're concerned about users that
- call frequently but spend very little time connected.
-
- @node Close calls per day, Daily download limit, Connect time per day, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Maximum number of close calls per day
- @cindex Close calls
- @cindex Limits, close calls
-
- Now we get really tricky. First of all, you say,
- ``What the heck is a `close call'? I just about got hit by
- a truck, is that what you mean?'' Not quite. We define a close
- call to be any call made by a user that occurs a certain small
- amount of time after the termination of his/her last call.
- Ruggies frequently do this, as you'll know if you examine your
- @file{calllog.sys} file after ruggie problems---you'll probably see
- lots of (usually short) calls, one after the other. They will
- do this for sure if you have defined the @code{msgenter} parameter,
- since that value unreasonably limits the number of drivelous
- messages they can post during one call.
-
- Well, there's hope. Simply define the @file{ctdlcnfg.sys}
- @vindex closetime
- parameter @code{#closetime} to be the number of minutes separating
- what you think are two calls that are ``close''. We suggest
- something like 10 minutes. Next, define the parameter
- @code{maxclosecalls} to be the maximum number of close calls that
- users will be allowed on a daily basis. We suggest a number
- somewhere between 3 and 5 if you're having problems, but be
- aware that you'll also be putting the clamps on any decent
- users that have bad line noise problems or call-waiting on
- their phone lines (they'll get disconnected frequently and
- probably try calling back right away).
-
- If either of the above parameters is set to @samp{0}, there is
- (you got it) no limit. Also, predictably, Aides, Co-Sysops and the Sysop
- are exempt from the limit. Be aware, when setting @code{maxclosecalls},
- that all users start each day with this stat set to @samp{1}. Their
- first call is by definition close to itself. Make sense?
-
- @node Daily download limit, Twit status, Close calls per day, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Daily download limit
- @cindex Download limits
- @cindex Limits, download
-
- For those users that may be downloading stuff like crazy,
- you may want to set a limit on how much they can do in a day.
- Use the @file{ctdlcnfg.sys} parameter @code{#download}, which is a number
- @vindex download
- defining the maximum number of kilobytes of files downloadable
- by any user (except Aides, Co-Sysops and the Sysop) per day. If the value is
- @samp{0}, there is, of course, no limit.
-
- @node Twit status, Inheritance, Daily download limit, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Twit status
- @cindex Twit status
-
- This is the ``twit-bit''; it's a flag in the user log
- record to tell the system that the user is, as they say,
- a twit. To set it, use the @code{[T]wit toggle} command from
- the @code{[U]ser status} sub-menu under the Sysop menu
- (@pxref{User Status Commands}).
-
- What does the twit-bit do, you ask? The most useful function of the twit-bit
- is to cause all messages entered by twits to be saved not to the message base,
- but to the Great Bit Bucket In The Sky. (I.e., they are thrown away the
- nanosecond the user hits @code{[S]ave}.) Note that this is different
- from the purge feature, covered in @ref{Message purging}, where local
- messages from undesirables are actually saved, but then automatically deleted
- later.
-
- In addition, certain Fnordadel functions will be
- mysteriously inoperative or different for a twit.
- @itemize @bullet
- @item
- A twit may not use the @code{[C]hat} command.
- @item
- He/she may not upload or download files.
- @item
- Doors are inaccessible to a twit.
- @item
- The command @samp{.RG} for reading all new
- messages on the system will be mapped to @code{[N]ew}.
- @item
- A twit will not be allowed to
- use @code{.E(nter) R(oom)}.
- @item
- As a sort of side-effect, no new
- users will be allowed to login to the system immediately after
- a twit has @code{[T]erminate}d. (This is to stop his buddies, or new
- aliases with him attached.)
- As soon as one existing user signon has occured, new users will
- once again be allowed to login. (This function assumes that
- you're not running your Fnordadel in validation mode. @xref{Closed system}.)
- @end itemize
-
- @node Inheritance, Message purging, Twit status, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Inheritance
- @cindex Inheritance
- @cindex Twit status inheritance
-
- Another favorite trick of ruggies is to play
- around with the @code{.T(erminate) S(tay)} feature---that form
- of @code{.T(erminate)} which allows the user to stay connected
- and login again (presumably under a different alias).
-
- Fnordadel makes an assumption which is pretty
- accurate, most of the time. It assumes that anyone who
- logs in after a twit has used @samp{.TS} is also a twit, and
- assigns him/her twit status just as if the Sysop had
- manually done so.
-
- Currently, Fnordadel allows only twit status
- to be inherited; the capability may be extended to
- include purging and whatever else may arise.
-
- @node Message purging, Login restrictions, Inheritance, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Message purging
- @cindex Message purging
- @cindex Purging messages from ruggies
- @cindex Ruggie message purging
-
- This is probably the goofiest yet most useful of the ruggie
- control features, mainly because it's the most devious.
- Essentially, it allows Fnordadel to automatically
- delete all messages from specified users, immediately
- upon said users' disconnection from the system. Also, if
- you set the @file{ctdlcnfg.sys} parameter @code{#purgenet} to @samp{1}, all
- @vindex purgenet
- incoming net messages (except in @code{Mail>}) from specified
- users @emph{or net nodes} will be purged.
-
- Place a file called @file{purge.sys} into your
- @code{#sysdir}. It should contain a list of user or node names, one
- @vindex sysdir
- per line, to whom the purge will apply. Case is irrelevant,
- since all name comparisons during searches ignore case. Now invoke
- @pindex +purge (citadel)
- @code{citadel} with @samp{+purge} on the command line.
-
- When Fnordadel is brought up it reads the
- contents of @file{purge.sys} into memory. When a user
- @code{[T]erminate}s, or a network session finishes, the list is checked.
- New messages from the desired users and nodes are deleted, except for those
- posted in the @code{Mail>} room (this gives them a chance to talk to you
- and redeem themselves).
- The deleted messages will appear in @code{Aide>} in the case of
- locally-entered messages; they will be marked by @samp{The following
- message deleted from @var{xyz}> by Citadel}.
-
- You can modify this behavior by setting the @file{ctdlcnfg.sys} variable
- @vindex vaporize
- @code{#vaporize} to @samp{1}. If you do this, your system will actually
- ``roll back'' all messages (including those in @code{Mail>}) entered by the
- ruggie, reclaiming the space
- they took up in the message base. This action is logged in @code{Aide>}.
- Note that if the user caused any @code{Aide>} messages to be generated during
- his/her stay, they will be lost along will all the other user messages when
- the vaporization occurs. This fact is logged in @code{Aide>} also, but the
- lost @code{Aide>} messages themselves are not recoverable,
- unless you are archiving the room. @xref{Sysop room-editing commands}.
-
- Normal purging takes a little time,
- but vaporize mode takes even longer. Use with caution (if it screws up,
- it will probably toast your message base), and only if you are being
- plagued with so many ruggie postings that they're causing serious space
- wastage in your message base. Better yet, if you're having this much
- trouble, consider moving and changing your identity.
-
- The purge list can be maintained by using a text
- editor on the @file{purge.sys} file when the @sc{bbs} is down; and by
- the use of the @code{[P]urge} sub-menu under the Sysop menu when
- when the @sc{bbs} is up. @xref{Purge and Westwict menus}, for
- details on how the menu works.
-
- The purge feature works fairly well; however, it
- does nothing to make your message base impervious to
- having loads of crap dumped in it in the first place. If you
- want to stop the messages from being entered while still keeping
- your system up, you have only
- two choices: use the twit status bit a lot (@pxref{Twit status}) or
- go to validation mode (@pxref{Closed system}).
-
- Note also that Fnordadel makes no check to see
- that names in @file{purge.sys} are those of existing users on
- your system; this allows you to add the names of ruggies
- who may have been terrorising other boards but not yours.
- You can prepare in advance for their arrival. Also, once
- a ruggie has hit your system, he may leave it alone long
- enough for his user account to scroll out of your user file.
- If he ever signs back on with the same name, however, he
- will still be purged immediately.
-
- Finally, the purge function can be applied to incoming net
- traffic as well as locally-entered messages. This can be effective
- in eliminating dreck from problem net nodes to which you don't connect
- directly. Even better, net messages eliminated by the purger never
- make it into your message base, so they cause no space wastage. They are
- either permanently lost, or saved each in its own offline file for you to
- manually process. See
- @vindex purgenet
- @vindex keepdiscards
- @code{#purgenet} and @code{#keepdiscards} in
- @ref{Optional parameters, , Optional Networking Parameters},
- and the @code{[D]iscarded messages} menu in @ref{The Net Menu}.
-
- @node Login restrictions, Purge and Westwict menus, Message purging, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Login restrictions
- @cindex Login restrictions
- @cindex Restrictions on logins
-
- This doesn't really qualify as an anti-ruggie
- feature, in the truest sense, but we'll put it here
- anyway because it's similar.
-
- Put a file called @file{restrict.sys} in your @code{#sysdir}
- @vindex sysdir
- containing a list of user names, one per line. When
- Fnordadel is brought up it reads the list into memory.
- @pindex +restrict (citadel)
- If you specify @samp{+restrict} on the @code{citadel} command
- line, or if you manually turn on restrictions using the
- @code{[W]estwict} command in the Sysop menu, then Fnordadel will
- restrict logins to only those users named in @file{restrict.sys}.
- All other attempted logins, whether by new users or by
- existing users, will be refused---the system will spit
- out the @file{restrict.blb} file, located in your @code{#helpdir},
- @vindex helpdir
- or a simple ``sorry, the system is closed'' message if it
- can't find @file{restrict.blb}.
-
- In the ruggie-control sense, login restrictions
- could be used to restrict access to your system to only
- those users that you know are ``safe'', without having to
- actually process their applications and create their
- accounts yourself (as required by ``validation'' mode). As with purging,
- it has the advantage that you may specify the names of
- users who have never logged in, so you can ``reserve a
- spot'' for them, as it were. (Of course, this is itself a security
- hole, because a ruggie can try to guess who you've got
- in your restrict list@dots{} but let's not get too paranoid.)
-
- Login restrictions were originally put in during
- a round of hacking on the software in which we were
- constantly interrupted during testing by users calling
- the board; we wanted to reserve the board for ourselves,
- without disabling it. Another possible use for login
- restrictions is to designate a certain time period for
- ``members only'' or some such; simply set up a pair of
- events which exit to a command shell, where a script file
- copies a new @file{restrict.blb} into place, and then reruns
- @code{citadel}. The first event set the restriction to
- ``members only'', and the second event resets things to open
- access. The possibilities are endless!
-
- @node Purge and Westwict menus, Network security, Login restrictions, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Purge and Westwict menus
-
- The purge and restrict lists may be manipulated using
- these two menus. Their operation is identical. The commands are:
- @cindex Purge menu
- @cindex Restrict menu
- @cindex Westwict menu
- @example
- [A]dd name to list
- [D]elete name from list
- [S]witch function on/off
- [V]iew list in RAM
- [W]rite list to disk
- e[X]it menu
- @end example
-
- @table @code
- @item [A]dd name to list
- This allows you to add another name to
- the list. No check is made to see whether
- the name is that of a currently-existing user;
- this is deliberate. (See below).
-
- @item [D]elete name from list
- Use this to remove someone from the list.
-
- @item [S]witch function on/off
- This toggles purging/restrictions on or off.
- If it is off, the list will still be kept in memory, so
- the feature can be turned on again at any time.
-
- @item [V]iew list in RAM
- This displays a list of the names currently in
- the list stored in memory.
-
- @item [W]rite list to disk
- After you've made some changes to the
- list, you'll probably want to make them permanent. Use
- this command to write the contents of the list in @sc{ram} to
- disk (as the file @file{purge.sys} or @file{restrict.sys}.) The old
- file, if it exists, will be overwritten.
-
- @item e[X]it menu
- Exit back to the main Sysop menu.
- @end table
-
- @node Network security, Closed system, Purge and Westwict menus, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Network security
- @cindex Security, network
- @cindex Network security
-
- If you suspect another Citadel net node is actively
- causing you grief (or if you just want to play it safe/paranoid), there
- are a few things you can do to protect your system. The first
- is to set up net passwords with the systems
- you normally net with, assuming you trust them (see @code{[P]asswords} in
- @ref{Editing Nodes}.) There have been
- incidents in the past where unscrupulous Sysops set up systems
- that looked exactly like other systems, and then dialed in to
- places in order to intercept shared rooms and @code{Mail>}, and generally
- cause chaos. Net passwords were put in to prevent this behavior.
-
- Two other things you can do are to set the @code{anonnetmail}
- and/or @code{#anonfilexfer} parameters in @file{ctdlcnfg.sys}. These
- @vindex anonfilexfer
- parameters, if set to @samp{0}, will make your system reject attempted
- incoming net mail and file transfer requests, respectively, if the
- sending node is not in your net list. This prevents rogue
- systems from scrolling your @code{Mail>} room and message base, or
- filling up all available disk storage. It would also prevent
- the ``junk mail'' phenomenon, which is already a problem with fax
- machines. Heaven help us all if it hits @sc{bbs} networks.
-
- @node Closed system, , Network security, Secret Weapons
- @subsection Closed system
- @cindex Closing your system
-
- So, let's say that everything else has failed.
- The ruggies have found out about all of the above
- features, and have found workarounds for all of them. Or
- they haven't, but have enough time and perseverence to keep
- plugging away with every automated macro and trick they
- can come up with. What do you do now?
-
- Much as we hate to suggest it, the best option is
- probably to close your system. To do so, simply change
- the value of the @file{ctdlcnfg.sys} variable @code{#loginok} to {0}.
- @vindex loginok
- This will prevent new users from creating their own
- accounts; they will only be able to leave mail to the
- Sysop to request that you create an account for them. You
- will then have total control over who gets access to your
- system; unfortunately, you'll also have opened up a whole
- new can of problem worms, such as ruggies who request bogus
- accounts by just randomly pulling names from the phone book.
- At this point, you should be talking to your
- phone company about getting an unlisted phone number, and
- perhaps a line trace. They might be willing to help you out.
-
- In conjunction with this step, you may also need to define the
- @file{ctdlcnfg.sys} parameter called
- @vindex anonmailmax
- @code{#anonmailmax}, which controls the size of mail messages
- enterable by users that aren't logged in. This will help prevent
- ruggies who can no longer log in from causing you problems in
- Mail>, the last room available to them.
-
- @node Ruggie Hints and Notes, , Secret Weapons, Anti-Ruggie Measures
- @section Other Hints and Notes
-
- @itemize @bullet
- @item
- When using the purge feature on incoming net traffic, make sure
- that none of the user names in your purge list is the same as
- any net node you get messages from. The results are obvious,
- and highly annoying.
-
- Also, the net purge currently is set to be very literal about
- matching user names on other nodes---no substring matching
- is done. This prevents messages from @samp{Dr. Zamboni} from being
- blown away along with those from @samp{Dr. Zam}. However, it is
- marginally possible (due to all the strange and wonderful
- variants of Citadel out there) that messages from @samp{Dr. Zam}
- would not be purged due to some software somewhere sticking
- extra crap in the user name field, e.g. @samp{Dr. Zam @@ Foobar}.
- This isn't supposed to happen, but it might. We'll figure
- something out to get around it when/if it becomes a problem.
-
- @item
- When users exceed any of the limit values you have defined,
- the system keeps track of the excess amount over and above
- the maximums, and rolls that amount forward to future days.
- This is done like so: When the user calls back any day after
- today (could be many days from now), the system subtracts from
- his/her accumulated stats the maximum values you set. It then
- checks to see if the user should be allowed access; if not,
- the new lower limit values are saved and the user is logged off.
- Thus users who abuse your system (especially in the total
- connect time area) could penalize themselves for several days.
- @strong{Note:} The system does not care if the user calls back tomorrow
- or four weeks from now. No extra deductions from the user's
- accumulated stats are made if he/she waits for several days or
- weeks to call back.
-
- @strong{Also note:} If a user makes a call and is prevented access due
- to one or another of your defined limits, the call is counted
- and recorded against their time and number of calls limits,
- even though the user was not allowed onto the system.
-
- @strong{Final note:} If you don't like this behavior of rolling overages
- forward, you can get rid of it using the @file{ctdlcnfg.sys} parameter
- @vindex autozerolimit
- @code{#autozerolimit}. If set to @samp{1}, this flag tells the system to
- graciously wipe out all the user's limit values and start from
- scratch, rather than bringing forward any extra amounts.
-
- @item
- If you need to manually reset a user's limit statistics, for
- some reason, you can do so using the @code{[R]eset} daily limits
- command of the user status menu. You can look at a user's
- current stats using the @code{[V]iew user status} command in the
- same menu. @xref{User Status Commands}.
-
- @item
- The system pauses for about 20 seconds on bad passwords, to
- discourage password guessing. After a certain number of bad
- login attempts (currently 3), the system will disconnect the
- caller.
-
- @item
- If you're having ruggie problems and haven't got as far
- as closing your system yet, you'll want to make sure that
- you aren't being too careless with the new users'
- privileges. The @file{ctdlcnfg.sys} variable @code{#allnet} is a good
- @vindex allnet
- one to check; if it's set to @samp{1}, all new users are given
- net privs (and can therefore enter net messages in shared
- rooms, whether the room is autonet or not). If you net
- long-distance rooms (or even just local ones), it would
- be both a profound annoyance for all the other Sysops,
- and a possibly expensive proposition in the case of LD
- netting, to send out a flood of messages from a ruggie
- who was allowed to post net messages in a shared room.
- Be careful. (@xref{Networking}.)
- @end itemize
-